Accident Reconstruction & Crash Testing Case Study

Using enDAQ Sensors to Investigate Motorcycle Impact Into a Vehicle

This case study describes how Momentum Engineering Corp. used enDAQ sensors to conduct three real-world motorcycle-to-car crash tests, establishing the relationship between EDR data and actual motorcycle speed loss during impact—enabling more accurate accident reconstruction for legal cases.

Executive summary

How Momentum Engineering Corp. used enDAQ to measure motorcycle crash severity directly

For accident reconstruction engineers, vehicle Event Data Recorders (EDRs) are a primary source of crash data. But in motorcycle-vehicle collisions, the rider's mass complicates calculations and no direct measurement of motorcycle severity had been possible—until MEC mounted enDAQ sensors on both motorcycles and vehicles during three live crash tests.

Challenge
Unmeasured Motorcycle Crash Severity Existing methods relied solely on vehicle EDR data to calculate motorcycle speed loss, but rider mass and momentum exchange introduced unknown inaccuracies.
Solution
Dual Sensor Crash Testing enDAQ sensors were mounted at the center of gravity on both the motorcycles and the vehicles. Three crash tests were performed with different motorcycle/vehicle pairings.
Results
Validated EDR Accuracy Range> The EDR data predicted motorcycle ΔV within −5.9 to +3.1 mph, with the actual measured severity consistently falling between full-mass and half-mass dummy calculations.
 

Download PDF of Case Study


The Challenge

Accurately calculating motorcycle speed loss in a broadside collision

For accident reconstruction firms like MEC, the data from a vehicle's Event Data Recorder (EDR)—triggered when the airbag control module deploys—is essential to determining speeds and impact forces. This is well-established for vehicle-on-vehicle crashes. But motorcycle-vehicle accidents present a unique problem.

When reconstructing motorcycle-vehicle crashes, the rider's mass can significantly affect the outcome of a crash investigation. Ed Fatzinger of MEC wanted to determine the correct effective mass for motorcycle/rider combinations to accurately calculate speed loss, and to understand how reliably the struck vehicle's EDR data could be used to derive the motorcycle's speed loss.

  • Rider mass creates ambiguity in EDR-derived motorcycle ΔV calculations.
  • No direct measurement tool had previously been used to validate EDR-derived motorcycle speed loss.
  • Sensors needed to survive motorcycle crash impacts and remain attached throughout the event.
  • Results needed to be applicable to real-world case investigation and legal testimony.

enDAQ-Sensors-Case-Study-Momentum-Engineering-Car-Crash

THE Solution

Ruggedized enDAQ sensors surviving real crash impacts

Because of the enDAQ sensor's portability and compact size, sensors were directly affixed to both the motorcycles and vehicles. The team installed enDAQ S4-R500D40 sensors near the center of gravity of three sport bike motorcycles, and S4-E25D40 sensors at the center of gravity of the three vehicles.

The sensors were strong and robust enough to survive the impact of a motorcycle crashing into a car at speed, reliably capturing data that accident reconstruction engineers had been unable to directly measure before. Three motorcycle-to-car crash tests were performed, each with a dummy in full gear weighing approximately 200 pounds colliding with the front right corner of a passenger vehicle:

  • Kawasaki ZRX1200R vs. Chevrolet Malibu
  • Yamaha YZF-R6 vs. Ford Focus
  • Kawasaki Ninja EX300 vs. Nissan Sentra

enDAQ-Sensors-Case-Study-Momentum-Engineering-Car-Crash-2


"What we did was we pretended as if this were a crash that we were investigating — so we used the airbag data from the car to calculate what we thought the severity of the motorcycle would be. And then the sensor data from the motorcycle told us what the severity actually was."
— Nick Famiglietti, Momentum Engineering Corp.

Results

First direct measurement of motorcycle crash severity vs. EDR predictions

EDR predicted motorcycle ΔV within a range of −5.9 mph to +3.1 mph across all three tests

With two triaxial accelerometers (piezoresistive and variable capacitance) plus a gyroscope on each enDAQ device, MEC measured multiple crash parameters simultaneously. The 5th-order Bessel filter built into the enDAQ sensor was applied, with the cutoff frequency set to 1/5th of the sample rate.


"Motorcycle crash test results"
Motorcycle crash test results for three vehicle pairings
Metric Kawasaki vs. Malibu Yamaha vs. Focus Kawasaki vs. Sentra
Motorcycle ΔV Resultant (mph) 37 38.9 38.8
Pulse Duration (seconds) 0.073 0.094 0.145

Additional key metrics recorded across the tests included a velocity change of approximately 37 mph (650 in/s), a ΔV pulse duration of around 0.1 second, and peak acceleration levels of approximately 500g. The study established that the actual impact severity measured by the enDAQ sensor consistently fell between the full-dummy-mass and half-dummy-mass EDR predictions, providing a validated framework for future motorcycle crash reconstruction.

  • Peak acceleration of ~500g recorded and survived by enDAQ sensors during live crashes.
  • Validated EDR accuracy for motorcycle broadside collision speed calculations for the first time.
  • Findings published as a technical paper in SAE International.
  • Results provide a defensible framework for motorcycle crash legal testimony.

enDAQ-Sensors-Case-Study-Momentum-Engineering-Car-Crash-3


Frequently Asked Questions

What is EDR data and why is it used in crash reconstruction?

An Event Data Recorder (EDR) captures vehicle data such as speed, braking, and acceleration when an airbag deploys. This data is used by accident reconstructionists to calculate the forces involved in a crash and estimate pre-impact speeds.

Why does rider mass complicate motorcycle crash reconstruction?

The rider's mass becomes part of the momentum exchange during a crash. Whether the full rider mass or a partial mass should be applied when calculating motorcycle ΔV from vehicle EDR data had not been definitively determined—MEC's research provides the first direct validation of this relationship.

How did the enDAQ sensors survive 500g crash impacts?

enDAQ sensors are ruggedized for harsh environments and high-shock applications. The S4-R500D40 model used on the motorcycles is specifically designed for high-g shock events, making it suited for direct crash testing applications.

What filtering was applied to the crash data?

The team used the 5th-order Bessel filter built into the enDAQ sensor, with the cutoff frequency set to 1/5th of the sample rate. Additional analysis was performed using the filtering tools in enDAQ Lab software.

Can enDAQ sensors be used for other vehicle crash testing applications?

Yes. enDAQ sensors have been applied across a wide range of crash testing scenarios, including bicycle braking, vehicle impacts, and aerospace shock testing, thanks to their configurable sensor range, multiple accelerometer types, and compact form factor.


Book a Demo

Welcome. Our product engineers are happy to listen & guide you through the best options for your application:

  • Which is the best enDAQ Data Logger for my application? What are its features, and can I see an analysis example pertinent to my application?

  • How can your software, including the enDAQ Cloud help me upload, customize, visualize, and share my data?

enDAQ-sensors-group-orange-reflection-600x324